Comparison of Thirty Seconds over Tokyo and Pearl Harbor Essay

Comparison of 30 Seconds over capital of Japan and Pearl harbour - set about ExampleWhile the themes and characters are similar in two movies, the manners of expression within the movies differ in numerous ways. There are also similarities and differences in opthalmic aspects of the movie, aspects of production, camera shots and angles, and mise en scene. Although two of these films contain thematic content that has been the subject of numerous films, the writers, directors, and editors of Thirty Seconds over Tokyo and Pearl Harbor have managed to create films that are unique and were considered great films of their time. The cinematographer interprets and intensifies the elements of mise en scene and the lighting as they see fit to create the imagery according to the instruction of the director. The mise en scne includes numerous aspects of the cinematic experience, including the scenery, movement and positioning of the actors, props, the background, the blocking, and the int ensity of the lighting. The mise en scene in Thirty Seconds over Tokyo accurately depicts elements of the time with costumes and numerous elements as does Pearl Harbor. However, the mise en scene in Thirty Seconds over Tokyo is a bit more authentic, undoubtedly because the film was made during the 1940s when these elements were considerably available and Pearl Harbor was made decades later. Despite these slight differences in the various elements of mise en scene, both films were able to accurately coordinate the various elements of mise en scene to present stunning, moving films. The contrasts between the visual aspects of the movie, aspects of production, camera shots and angles, and mise en scene within both the films have allowed the directors to create stunning remakes of the same satisfying that is both distinctive and original.